Wow: The Annotated New York Times tracks blog mentions of individual NYT articles.
If the reporters are reading all this stuff, will they have enough time for their actual jobs?
(Via Steve Rubel)
Recent Comments
- This is Zimbabwe on Taking Media Risks in a Dictatorship
- sexchat on Copyright Progress, Maybe
- bob brouse on The Gathering Storms Over Speech
- Springer on Newspapers: Open Your Archives
- osoviajero on Fueling the Bubble
- jordan on Huffington's Celebrity Group Blog
- Tom Bradley on The End of Objectivity (Version 0.91)
- Warren Redlich on The God-Awful McDonald's Blog
- Jane on Google Toolbar, an Update
- John Mackward on The God-Awful McDonald's Blog
May 2005
« Government Intervention's Double-Edged Blade | Main | New Media Law Blog »
April 04, 2005
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Highlights
- The Gathering Storms Over Speech
How an arrogant Apple Computer, cynical election law enforcers and well-meaning legislators are threatening tomorrow's journalists. - Where Newspapers Can Start the Conversation
On the Editorial Page, of course... - Newspapers: Open Your Archives
Maybe there's more money in "free" search than paid archives. There's certainly more community value. - The End of Objectivity
If objectivity is unattainable, let's replace it with something better.
Recent Posts
- Reminder: New Site and Blog
- Moving Day...
- Journalistic Ethics, Codes of
- Good Morning Silicon Valley Blog
- Business Model: Cause Customers Trouble, Make Them Pay to Fix
- Drug War Still Failing
- Comment Spammers On Attack
- Google's Toolbar Keeps Invasive Autolink
- Celebrating Political Sleaze
- Hyperlocal and Google
Grassroots Thinking
Talks & Travels
- 05/07/05, Nashville
BlogNashville - 05/16/05, New York City
Personal Democracy Forum - 05/25/05, Carlsbad, CA
D: All Things Digital
Pretty clever. I see that the top article to be referenced has twenty references. Remember when I told you in December that I found last year how many NYT forum posts Brooks was getting? I think I said three hundred but it was 200. Still pretty big. That's why I proposed having a way to self-categorize the tone of the responses.
Posted by: Jon Garfunkel | April 04, 2005 at 10:36 PM