What Blogosphere Says About NYT
Wow: The Annotated New York Times tracks blog mentions of individual NYT articles.
If the reporters are reading all this stuff, will they have enough time for their actual jobs?
(Via Steve Rubel)
Recent Comments
- This is Zimbabwe on Taking Media Risks in a Dictatorship
- sexchat on Copyright Progress, Maybe
- bob brouse on The Gathering Storms Over Speech
- Springer on Newspapers: Open Your Archives
- osoviajero on Fueling the Bubble
- jordan on Huffington's Celebrity Group Blog
- Tom Bradley on The End of Objectivity (Version 0.91)
- Warren Redlich on The God-Awful McDonald's Blog
- Jane on Google Toolbar, an Update
- John Mackward on The God-Awful McDonald's Blog
May 2005
« Government Intervention's Double-Edged Blade | Main | New Media Law Blog »
April 04, 2005
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834207e7e53ef00d834590a0b69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What Blogosphere Says About NYT:
» The Annotated NYT from Snarkmarket
I'm not sure I understand what's going on here, but I know it's insane. (Via Steve Rubel by way of Dan Gillmor.)... [Read More]
» If the Times won't come to the mountain... from The Power of Many
An essay I've struggled with writing for Jay Rosen about how the New York Times and other newspapers could become full citizens of the web has eluded me as I continue to mull over the possibilities, but in the meantime,... [Read More]
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Highlights
- The Gathering Storms Over Speech
How an arrogant Apple Computer, cynical election law enforcers and well-meaning legislators are threatening tomorrow's journalists. - Where Newspapers Can Start the Conversation
On the Editorial Page, of course... - Newspapers: Open Your Archives
Maybe there's more money in "free" search than paid archives. There's certainly more community value. - The End of Objectivity
If objectivity is unattainable, let's replace it with something better.
Recent Posts
- Reminder: New Site and Blog
- Moving Day...
- Journalistic Ethics, Codes of
- Good Morning Silicon Valley Blog
- Business Model: Cause Customers Trouble, Make Them Pay to Fix
- Drug War Still Failing
- Comment Spammers On Attack
- Google's Toolbar Keeps Invasive Autolink
- Celebrating Political Sleaze
- Hyperlocal and Google
Grassroots Thinking
Talks & Travels
- 05/07/05, Nashville
BlogNashville - 05/16/05, New York City
Personal Democracy Forum - 05/25/05, Carlsbad, CA
D: All Things Digital
Pretty clever. I see that the top article to be referenced has twenty references. Remember when I told you in December that I found last year how many NYT forum posts Brooks was getting? I think I said three hundred but it was 200. Still pretty big. That's why I proposed having a way to self-categorize the tone of the responses.
Posted by: Jon Garfunkel | April 04, 2005 at 10:36 PM